Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy A36 vs Apple - iPhone 17

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy A36SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy A36
61.5/ 100C
Performance47· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
iPhone 17APPLERENDER
Probe B
Apple
iPhone 17
61.7/ 100C
Performance65· 25%
Battery46· 20%
Display66· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy A36 and iPhone 17, the Galaxy A36 comes out ahead in wired charging and battery capacity, while the iPhone 17 wins on antutu and pixel density. Overall, the Galaxy A36 scores 61.5 and the iPhone 17 scores 61.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (61.5 vs 61.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Galaxy A36 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are wired charging, battery capacity, screen size, among others.

Pick the iPhone 17 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are antutu, pixel density, weight, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Samsung - Galaxy A36 wins

  • Wired charging — 66.67% more. 45 W vs 27 W.
  • Battery capacity — 35.43% more. 5000 mAh vs 3692 mAh.
  • Screen size — 6.35% more. 6.7 " vs 6.3 ".
  • Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.

Why Apple - iPhone 17 wins

  • AnTuTu — 209.38% more. 1980000 vs 640000.
  • Pixel density — 19.48% more. 460 ppi vs 385 ppi.
  • Weight — 1.00 g less. 194 vs 195.
  • Water resistance: IP68 (vs IP67).
  • Wireless charging: 25 W vs 0 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Apple - iPhone 17
Weight195 g194 glead
Thickness7.4 mmlead8.1 mm
Water resistanceIP67IP68lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Apple - iPhone 17
Screen size6.7 "lead6.3 "
Pixel density385 ppi460 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1900 nits2200 nitslead

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Apple - iPhone 17
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage128 GB256 GBlead
AnTuTu6400001980000lead
CPU total clock8.4 GHz19.2 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Apple - iPhone 17
Main camera50 MPlead48 MP
Front camera12 MP12 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Apple - iPhone 17
Battery capacity5000 mAhlead3692 mAh
Wired charging45 Wlead27 W
Wireless charging0 W25 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Apple - iPhone 17
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Apple - iPhone 17
OSAndroidiOSlead
Promised OS updates6 years6 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy A36 or iPhone 17?+

Galaxy A36 has 35.4% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 3692 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy A36 or iPhone 17?+

iPhone 17 is 1g lighter — 195g vs 194g.

Is Galaxy A36 waterproof?+

Galaxy A36 has an IP67 rating.

Does iPhone 17 support 5G?+

Yes, iPhone 17 supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy A36 or iPhone 17?+

Galaxy A36 has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.