Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo vs Polaroid - Now+ Generation 2
Between the Instax Wide Evo and Now+ Generation 2, the Instax Wide Evo comes out ahead in hybrid (digital + print), while the Now+ Generation 2 wins on film format. Overall, the Instax Wide Evo scores 69.4 and the Now+ Generation 2 scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Now+ Generation 2 edges ahead on the Mars Score (69.4 vs 73.1), but the 3.7-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Instax Wide Evo if you care most about hybrid (digital + print). The biggest gaps in its favor are hybrid (digital + print).
Pick the Now+ Generation 2 if you care most about film format. Its strongest claims are film format.
Both ship with comparable double exposure, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo wins
- ▲Has Hybrid (digital + print).
Why Polaroid - Now+ Generation 2 wins
- ▲Film format: Polaroid i-Type (vs Instax wide).
Spec comparison
Film
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo | Polaroid - Now+ Generation 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | Instax wide | Polaroid i-Typelead |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | truelead | false |
Features
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo | Polaroid - Now+ Generation 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Selfie mirror | false | truelead |
| Double exposure | true | true |
| Lens count | 1 | 2lead |
Design
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo | Polaroid - Now+ Generation 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 490 g | 457 glead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.