Between the Boombox 3 and Tufton, the Boombox 3 comes out ahead in output power and battery, while the Tufton wins on several specs. Overall, the Boombox 3 scores 86.4 and the Tufton scores 66.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Boombox 3 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 19.8 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Boombox 3 if you care most about output power and battery. The biggest gaps in its favor are output power, battery, low-end response, among others.
The Tufton similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable stereo pairing, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Boombox 3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why JBL - Boombox 3 wins
- ▲Output power — 125.00% more. 180 W vs 80 W.
- ▲Battery — 20.00% more. 24 h vs 20 h.
- ▲Low-end response — 7.00 Hz less. 40 vs 47.
- ▲Water resistance: IP67 (vs IPX2).
Why Marshall - Tufton wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Audio
| Spec | JBL - Boombox 3 | Marshall - Tufton |
|---|---|---|
| Output power | 180 Wlead | 80 W |
| Low-end response | 40 Hzlead | 47 Hz |
| Stereo pairing | true | true |
Durability
| Spec | JBL - Boombox 3 | Marshall - Tufton |
|---|---|---|
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP67lead | IPX2 |
| Weight | 6500 g | 4900 glead |
Battery
| Spec | JBL - Boombox 3 | Marshall - Tufton |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 24 hlead | 20 h |
| USB out (powerbank) | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.