Between the Charge 6 and Emberton III, the Charge 6 comes out ahead in output power and low-end response, while the Emberton III wins on battery. Overall, the Charge 6 scores 68.9 and the Emberton III scores 66.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (68.9 vs 66.8). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Charge 6 if you care most about output power and low-end response. The biggest gaps in its favor are output power, low-end response, water resistance.
Pick the Emberton III if you care most about battery. Its strongest claims are battery.
Both ship with comparable stereo pairing, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why JBL - Charge 6 wins
- ▲Output power — 125.00% more. 45 W vs 20 W.
- ▲Low-end response — 5.00 Hz less. 55 vs 60.
- ▲Water resistance: IP68 (vs IP67).
Why Marshall - Emberton III wins
- ▲Battery — 14.29% more. 32 h vs 28 h.
Spec comparison
Audio
| Spec | JBL - Charge 6 | Marshall - Emberton III |
|---|---|---|
| Output power | 45 Wlead | 20 W |
| Low-end response | 55 Hzlead | 60 Hz |
| Stereo pairing | true | true |
Durability
| Spec | JBL - Charge 6 | Marshall - Emberton III |
|---|---|---|
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68lead | IP67 |
| Weight | 1010 g | 700 glead |
Battery
| Spec | JBL - Charge 6 | Marshall - Emberton III |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 28 h | 32 hlead |
| USB out (powerbank) | truelead | false |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.