Between the ZAR and Monarch MKIII, the ZAR comes out ahead in several specs, while the Monarch MKIII wins on impedance and sensitivity. Overall, the ZAR scores 65.4 and the Monarch MKIII scores 72.9 on our Mars Score.
Qual você deve comprar?
The Monarch MKIII edges ahead on the Mars Score (65.4 vs 72.9), but the 7.5-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
The ZAR doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the Monarch MKIII if you care most about impedance and sensitivity. Its strongest claims are impedance, sensitivity, driver count.
Both ship with comparable detachable cable, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Monarch MKIII is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Por que o KZ - ZAR vence
- No decisive advantages.
Por que o ThieAudio - Monarch MKIII vence
- ▲Impedance — 4.00 Ω less. 22 vs 26.
- ▲Sensitivity — 3.70% more. 112 dB vs 108 dB.
- ▲Driver count — 2.00 more. 10 vs 8.
Comparação de specs
Drivers
| Spec | KZ - ZAR | ThieAudio - Monarch MKIII |
|---|---|---|
| Driver count | 8 | 10lead |
| Driver types | 1DD + 7BA Hybrid | 1DD + 6BA + 2EST + 1 Bone Conduction Tribrid |
| Impedanceⓘ | 26 Ω | 22 Ωlead |
| Sensitivityⓘ | 108 dB | 112 dBlead |
Build
| Spec | KZ - ZAR | ThieAudio - Monarch MKIII |
|---|---|---|
| Detachable cable | true | true |
| Connector | 0.78mm 2-pinlead | 2-pin |
Análises por spec
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.