Between the Z f and α7C II, the Z f comes out ahead in several specs, while the α7C II wins on weight and af points. Overall, the Z f scores 46 and the α7C II scores 52.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The α7C II edges ahead on the Mars Score (46 vs 52.8), but the 6.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
The Z f doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the α7C II if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, af points, megapixels.
Both ship with comparable sensor size, max video, in-body stabilization, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the α7C II is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Nikon - Z f wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Sony - α7C II wins
- ▲Weight — 196.00 g less. 514 vs 710.
- ▲AF points — 153.85% more. 759 vs 299.
- ▲Megapixels — 37.50% more. 33 MP vs 24 MP.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Nikon - Z f | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor sizeⓘ | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 33 MPlead |
| Max ISO | 64000lead | 51200 |
Video
| Spec | Nikon - Z f | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 4K60 | 4K60 |
| RAW video | false | false |
| Log profileⓘ | true | true |
Autofocus
| Spec | Nikon - Z f | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| AF pointsⓘ | 299 | 759lead |
| Eye AFⓘ | true | true |
| In-body stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Body & Controls
| Spec | Nikon - Z f | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 710 g | 514 glead |
| Weather sealedⓘ | true | true |
| Dual card slotsⓘ | false | false |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.