Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Nothing - Phone (3) vs Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Phone (3)NOTHINGRENDER
Probe A
Nothing
Phone (3)
68.7/ 100B
Performance71· 25%
Battery64· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Poco F7 UltraXIAOMIRENDER
Probe B
Xiaomi
Poco F7 Ultra
70.4/ 100B
Performance75· 25%
Battery66· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Phone (3) and Poco F7 Ultra, the Phone (3) comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the Poco F7 Ultra wins on wireless charging and wired charging. Overall, the Phone (3) scores 68.7 and the Poco F7 Ultra scores 70.4 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (68.7 vs 70.4). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Phone (3) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density, promised os updates, among others.

Pick the Poco F7 Ultra if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are wireless charging, wired charging, antutu, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, refresh rate, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Nothing - Phone (3) wins

  • Weight — 16.00 g less. 196 vs 212.
  • Pixel density — 3.14% more. 460 ppi vs 446 ppi.
  • Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
  • Screen size — 0.45% more. 6.7 " vs 6.67 ".

Why Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra wins

  • Wireless charging — 233.33% more. 50 W vs 15 W.
  • Wired charging — 84.62% more. 120 W vs 65 W.
  • AnTuTu — 28.78% more. 2640000 vs 2050000.
  • Battery capacity — 2.91% more. 5300 mAh vs 5150 mAh.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecNothing - Phone (3)Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra
Weight196 glead212 g
Thickness8.4 mm8.4 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecNothing - Phone (3)Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra
Screen size6.7 "lead6.67 "
Pixel density460 ppilead446 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4500 nitslead3200 nits

Performance

SpecNothing - Phone (3)Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
AnTuTu20500002640000lead
CPU total clock21.6 GHz22.8 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecNothing - Phone (3)Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera32 MP32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecNothing - Phone (3)Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra
Battery capacity5150 mAh5300 mAhlead
Wired charging65 W120 Wlead
Wireless charging15 W50 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecNothing - Phone (3)Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecNothing - Phone (3)Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates5 yearslead4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Phone (3) or Poco F7 Ultra?+

Poco F7 Ultra has 2.9% more battery — 5150 mAh vs 5300 mAh.

Which is lighter, Phone (3) or Poco F7 Ultra?+

Phone (3) is 16g lighter — 196g vs 212g.

Is Phone (3) waterproof?+

Phone (3) has an IP68 rating.

Does Poco F7 Ultra support 5G?+

Yes, Poco F7 Ultra supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, Phone (3) or Poco F7 Ultra?+

Poco F7 Ultra has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.