Skip to content
vsMars
Detalhe de spec · Sequential read

870 EVO 1TB vs T9 Portable 2TB

Uma leitura lado a lado de sequential read.

Samsung · 870 EVO 1TB
560MB/s
Samsung · T9 Portable 2TB
2000MB/s
lidera
VeredictoT9 Portable 2TB vence em sequential read.
Contexto

Entendendo sequential read

Sequential read is a numeric spec measured in MB/s. On this metric, higher values are generally better, but returns diminish past category-typical thresholds — going from a low value to a mid value usually matters far more than going from a mid value to a high one. When comparing two products, focus on the percentage gap rather than the raw delta: a 200-unit lead means something very different at the low end of the range than at the high end. Pay attention to the unit, too — manufacturers sometimes quote peak or burst figures that are not sustained in real-world use. Cross-check the published number against independent measurements where possible, especially for performance and battery claims. Finally, remember that a single spec rarely tells the whole story; the Mars Score weighs sequential read together with the rest of the spec sheet so one outlier doesn't distort the verdict.

Este dueloT9 Portable 2TB's 2000MB/s is roughly 257% higher than 870 EVO 1TB's 560MB/s (a 1440MB/s gap). Whether that gap is noticeable depends on workload — small percentage gaps rarely change day-to-day experience, while gaps of 20% or more usually do.

Ver mais detalhes

Outras specs nesta comparação

Veja a categoria completa SSDs com todos os produtos classificados pelo Mars Score.