Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H vs Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro
Between the Cordless Pro IZ862H and Floor One S7 Pro, the Cordless Pro IZ862H comes out ahead in battery and weight, while the Floor One S7 Pro wins on dustbin. Overall, the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 70.7 and the Floor One S7 Pro scores 70.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are evenly matched on the broad strokes, with the decision sitting on which individual spec advantages weigh more for your use.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery, weight.
Pick the Floor One S7 Pro if you care most about dustbin. Its strongest claims are dustbin.
Both ship with comparable suction (aw), cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Battery — 71.43% more. 60 min vs 35 min.
- ▲Weight — 1.00 kg less. 3.5 vs 4.5.
Why Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro wins
- ▲Dustbin — 21.43% more. 0.85 L vs 0.7 L.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 175 | 175 |
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.85 Llead |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Wet/dry cordlesslead |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.5 kglead | 4.5 kg |
| Battery | 60 minlead | 35 min |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.