Amazfit - T-Rex 3 vs Samsung - Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm)
Between the T-Rex 3 and Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm), the T-Rex 3 comes out ahead in battery life and display size, while the Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) wins on peak brightness and weight. Overall, the T-Rex 3 scores 79.7 and the Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) scores 43.8 on our Mars Score.
Hangisini almalısın?
The T-Rex 3 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 35.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the T-Rex 3 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery life, display size, water resistance.
Pick the Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, weight, ecg, among others.
Both ship with comparable spo2, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the T-Rex 3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Amazfit - T-Rex 3 neden kazanır
- ▲Battery life — 2140.00% more. 672 h vs 30 h.
- ▲Display size — 14.50% more. 1.5 " vs 1.31 ".
- ▲Water resistance — 5.00 ATM more. 10 vs 5.
Samsung - Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) neden kazanır
- ▲Peak brightness — 50.00% more. 3000 nits vs 2000 nits.
- ▲Weight — 39.20 g less. 28.8 vs 68.
- ▲Has ECG.
- ▲Has Cellular.
Spec karşılaştırması
Design
| Spec | Amazfit - T-Rex 3 | Samsung - Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Case size | 48.5 mmlead | 40 mm |
| Weight | 68 g | 28.8 glead |
| Case material | polymer | aluminum |
| Water resistanceⓘ | 10 ATMlead | 5 ATM |
Display
| Spec | Amazfit - T-Rex 3 | Samsung - Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Display size | 1.5 "lead | 1.31 " |
| Always-on display | true | true |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2000 nits | 3000 nitslead |
Health & Fitness
| Spec | Amazfit - T-Rex 3 | Samsung - Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) |
|---|---|---|
| ECG | false | truelead |
| SpO2 | true | true |
| Temperature sensor | true | true |
| Sleep tracking | true | true |
| Blood pressure | false | truelead |
Battery & Connectivity
| Spec | Amazfit - T-Rex 3 | Samsung - Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 672 hlead | 30 h |
| GPS | true | true |
| Cellular | false | truelead |
| NFC | false | truelead |
| OS | Zepp OSlead | WearOS |
Sık sorulanlar
Which has longer battery life, T-Rex 3 or Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm)?+
T-Rex 3 lasts 672h vs 30h.
Do T-Rex 3 or Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) support ECG?+
Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) supports ECG; T-Rex 3 does not.
Which has cellular, T-Rex 3 or Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm)?+
Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) offers a cellular variant; T-Rex 3 is Wi-Fi only.
Spec bazlı detaylar
Aynı markalardan dahası
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.