vsMars
Karşı karşıya

ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs Gigabyte - M27Q X

Son güncelleme · Mars Score nasıl çalışır
ROG Swift PG39WCDMASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
ROG Swift PG39WCDM
79.8/ 100A
Performance84· 45%
Panel75· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
M27Q XGIGABYTERENDER
Probe B
Gigabyte
M27Q X
65.7/ 100C
Performance79· 45%
Panel49· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Kısa karar

Between the ROG Swift PG39WCDM and M27Q X, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery and peak brightness, while the M27Q X wins on several specs. Overall, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM scores 79.8 and the M27Q X scores 65.7 on our Mars Score.

Satın alma tavsiyesi

Hangisini almalısın?

The ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 14.1 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the ROG Swift PG39WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.

The M27Q X similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, g-sync, freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM neden kazanır

  • ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 500.00% more. 90 W vs 15 W.
  • ▲Peak brightness — 225.00% more. 1300 nits vs 400 nits.
  • ▲Response time (GtG) — 90.00% less. 0.03 ms vs 0.3 ms.
  • ▲Screen size — 44.44% more. 39 " vs 27 ".
  • ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 7.61% more. 99 % vs 92 %.
  • ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).

Gigabyte - M27Q X neden kazanır

  • No decisive advantages.
Tüm veriler

Spec karşılaştırması

Panel

SpecASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDMGigabyte - M27Q X
Screen sizeⓘ39 "lead27 "
Panel typeⓘQD-OLEDleadIPS
Resolutionⓘ1440p1440p
Aspect ratioⓘ21:916:9
Curvedⓘtrueleadfalse

Performance

SpecASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDMGigabyte - M27Q X
Refresh rateⓘ240 Hz240 Hz
Response time (GtG)ⓘ0.03 mslead0.3 ms
Peak brightnessⓘ1300 nitslead400 nits
DCI-P3 coverageⓘ99 %lead92 %
HDRⓘtruetrue
G-Syncⓘtruetrue
FreeSyncⓘtruetrue

Connectivity

SpecASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDMGigabyte - M27Q X
HDMI ports22
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ90 Wlead15 W
KVMtruetrue
Okuyucu soruları

Sık sorulanlar

Which has higher refresh rate, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or M27Q X?+

M27Q X refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.

Which has faster response time, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or M27Q X?+

ROG Swift PG39WCDM responds in 0.03ms vs 0.3ms.

Does ROG Swift PG39WCDM or M27Q X have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on ROG Swift PG39WCDM, 15W on M27Q X.

Derine in

Spec bazlı detaylar

Screen size→Panel type→Resolution→Aspect ratio→Curved→Refresh rate→Response time (GtG)→Peak brightness→DCI-P3 coverage→HDR→G-Sync→FreeSync→
Üreticiye göre

Aynı markalardan dahası

ASUS →4
Gigabyte →4

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.