Between the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and XA75, the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K comes out ahead in sensor size, while the XA75 wins on xlr input and optical zoom. Overall, the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K scores 35 and the XA75 scores 70.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The XA75 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 35.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K if you care most about sensor size. The biggest gaps in its favor are sensor size.
Pick the XA75 if you care most about xlr input and optical zoom. Its strongest claims are xlr input, optical zoom.
Both ship with comparable max video, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the XA75 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Blackmagic - Pocket Cinema Camera 4K wins
- ▲Sensor size: Four Thirds (vs 1").
Why Canon - XA75 wins
- ▲Has XLR input.
- ▲Optical zoom: 15 vs 0.
Spec comparison
Video
| Spec | Blackmagic - Pocket Cinema Camera 4K | Canon - XA75 |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 4K60 | 4K60 |
| Optical zoom | 0 | 15lead |
| Sensor sizeⓘ | Four Thirdslead | 1" |
Audio
| Spec | Blackmagic - Pocket Cinema Camera 4K | Canon - XA75 |
|---|---|---|
| XLR input | false | truelead |
| Headphone jack | true | true |
Design
| Spec | Blackmagic - Pocket Cinema Camera 4K | Canon - XA75 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 722 glead | 1080 g |
| Articulating screen | false | truelead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.