Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Coway - Airmega 200M vs Honeywell - HPA300

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Airmega 200MCOWAYRENDER
Probe A
Coway
Airmega 200M
56.3/ 100D
Performance56· 70%
Smart & Noise· 30%
HPA300HONEYWELLRENDER
Probe B
Honeywell
HPA300
65.0/ 100C
Performance65· 70%
Smart & Noise· 30%
Quick verdict

Between the Airmega 200M and HPA300, the Airmega 200M comes out ahead in min noise, while the HPA300 wins on coverage and cadr. Overall, the Airmega 200M scores 56.3 and the HPA300 scores 65 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The HPA300 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.7 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the Airmega 200M if you care most about min noise. The biggest gaps in its favor are min noise.

Pick the HPA300 if you care most about coverage and cadr. Its strongest claims are coverage, cadr.

Both ship with comparable true hepa h13+, activated carbon, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the HPA300 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Coway - Airmega 200M wins

  • Min noise — 7.00 dB less. 25 vs 32.

Why Honeywell - HPA300 wins

  • Coverage — 33.33% more. 44 m² vs 33 m².
  • CADR — 27.50% more. 510 m³/h vs 400 m³/h.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Performance

SpecCoway - Airmega 200MHoneywell - HPA300
CADR400 m³/h510 m³/hlead
Coverage3344lead
True HEPA H13+truetrue
Activated carbontruetrue

Smart & Noise

SpecCoway - Airmega 200MHoneywell - HPA300
Min noise25 dBlead32 dB
Air quality sensortrueleadfalse
Smart appfalsefalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.