Between the UltraSharp U2725QE and MPG 321URX, the UltraSharp U2725QE comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery, while the MPG 321URX wins on peak brightness and refresh rate. Overall, the UltraSharp U2725QE scores 60.3 and the MPG 321URX scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The MPG 321URX is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the UltraSharp U2725QE if you care most about usb-c power delivery. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery.
Pick the MPG 321URX if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the MPG 321URX is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 42.86% more. 140 W vs 98 W.
Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 27 " | 32 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 240 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 5 ms | 0.03 mslead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 450 nits | 1000 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98 % | 99 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | truelead |
| FreeSyncⓘ | false | truelead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 1 | 2lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 140 Wlead | 98 W |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, UltraSharp U2725QE or MPG 321URX?+
MPG 321URX refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, UltraSharp U2725QE or MPG 321URX?+
MPG 321URX responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does UltraSharp U2725QE or MPG 321URX have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 140W on UltraSharp U2725QE, 98W on MPG 321URX.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.