Between the XM2we and ULX, the XM2we comes out ahead in several specs, while the ULX wins on polling rate and weight. Overall, the XM2we scores 69.6 and the ULX scores 81.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The ULX is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 11.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
The XM2we doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the ULX if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are polling rate, weight, battery.
Both ship with comparable max dpi, wireless, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the ULX is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Endgame Gear - XM2we wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Finalmouse - ULX wins
- ▲Polling rate — 300.00% more. 4000 Hz vs 1000 Hz.
- ▲Weight — 24.00 g less. 39 vs 63.
- ▲Battery — 11.11% more. 100 h vs 90 h.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Finalmouse - ULX |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 650 | 650 |
| Polling rate | 1000 Hz | 4000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Finalmouse - ULX |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 63 g | 39 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Finalmouse - ULX |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 90 h | 100 hlead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.