Between the MARQ Athlete (Gen 2) and Pacer Pro, the MARQ Athlete (Gen 2) comes out ahead in smartwatch mode and multi-band gps, while the Pacer Pro wins on gps mode. Overall, the MARQ Athlete (Gen 2) scores 45.3 and the Pacer Pro scores 39.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The MARQ Athlete (Gen 2) edges ahead on the Mars Score (45.3 vs 39.7), but the 5.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the MARQ Athlete (Gen 2) if you care most about smartwatch mode and multi-band gps. The biggest gaps in its favor are smartwatch mode, multi-band gps, ecg.
Pick the Pacer Pro if you care most about gps mode. Its strongest claims are gps mode.
Both ship with comparable solar charging, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the MARQ Athlete (Gen 2) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Garmin - MARQ Athlete (Gen 2) wins
- ▲Smartwatch mode — 128.57% more. 16 days vs 7 days.
- ▲Has Multi-band GPS.
- ▲Has ECG.
Why Polar - Pacer Pro wins
- ▲GPS mode — 16.67% more. 35 h vs 30 h.
Spec comparison
GPS & Sensors
| Spec | Garmin - MARQ Athlete (Gen 2) | Polar - Pacer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-band GPS | truelead | false |
| Barometric altimeter | true | true |
| Heart rate | true | true |
| ECG | truelead | false |
| Pulse Ox | truelead | false |
Battery
| Spec | Garmin - MARQ Athlete (Gen 2) | Polar - Pacer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Smartwatch mode | 16 dayslead | 7 days |
| GPS mode | 30 h | 35 hlead |
| Solar charging | false | false |
Design
| Spec | Garmin - MARQ Athlete (Gen 2) | Polar - Pacer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46 mmlead | 45 mm |
| Weight | 92 g | 41 glead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | 10 ATMlead | 5 ATM |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.