Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Nothing - Phone (3)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
iPhone 17 Pro MaxAPPLERENDER
Probe A
Apple
iPhone 17 Pro Max
67.5/ 100C
Performance70· 25%
Battery59· 20%
Display72· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Phone (3)NOTHINGRENDER
Probe B
Nothing
Phone (3)
68.7/ 100B
Performance71· 25%
Battery64· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the iPhone 17 Pro Max and Phone (3), the iPhone 17 Pro Max comes out ahead in wireless charging and screen size, while the Phone (3) wins on front camera and wired charging. Overall, the iPhone 17 Pro Max scores 67.5 and the Phone (3) scores 68.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (67.5 vs 68.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the iPhone 17 Pro Max if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are wireless charging, screen size, antutu, among others.

Pick the Phone (3) if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, wired charging, weight, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max wins

  • Wireless charging — 66.67% more. 25 W vs 15 W.
  • Screen size — 2.99% more. 6.9 " vs 6.7 ".
  • AnTuTu — 2.44% more. 2100000 vs 2050000.
  • Promised OS updates: 6 (vs 5).

Why Nothing - Phone (3) wins

  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Wired charging — 116.67% more. 65 W vs 30 W.
  • Weight — 31.00 g less. 196 vs 227.
  • Battery capacity — 9.93% more. 5150 mAh vs 4685 mAh.
  • Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecApple - iPhone 17 Pro MaxNothing - Phone (3)
Weight227 g196 glead
Thickness8.3 mmlead8.4 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecApple - iPhone 17 Pro MaxNothing - Phone (3)
Screen size6.9 "lead6.7 "
Pixel density460 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2200 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecApple - iPhone 17 Pro MaxNothing - Phone (3)
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage512 GBlead256 GB
AnTuTu2100000lead2050000
CPU total clock20.4 GHz21.6 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecApple - iPhone 17 Pro MaxNothing - Phone (3)
Main camera48 MP50 MPlead
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecApple - iPhone 17 Pro MaxNothing - Phone (3)
Battery capacity4685 mAh5150 mAhlead
Wired charging30 W65 Wlead
Wireless charging25 Wlead15 W

Connectivity

SpecApple - iPhone 17 Pro MaxNothing - Phone (3)
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecApple - iPhone 17 Pro MaxNothing - Phone (3)
OSiOSleadAndroid
Promised OS updates6 yearslead5 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, iPhone 17 Pro Max or Phone (3)?+

Phone (3) has 9.9% more battery — 4685 mAh vs 5150 mAh.

Which is lighter, iPhone 17 Pro Max or Phone (3)?+

Phone (3) is 31g lighter — 227g vs 196g.

Is iPhone 17 Pro Max waterproof?+

iPhone 17 Pro Max has an IP68 rating.

Does Phone (3) support 5G?+

Yes, Phone (3) supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, iPhone 17 Pro Max or Phone (3)?+

Phone (3) has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.