Skip to content
vsMars
Karşı karşıya

Vivo - iQOO 13 vs Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro

Son güncelleme · Mars Score nasıl çalışır
iQOO 13VIVORENDER
Probe A
Vivo
iQOO 13
75.3/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery76· 20%
Display75· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X Fold 3 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X Fold 3 Pro
73.1/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery71· 20%
Display78· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Kısa karar

Between the iQOO 13 and X Fold 3 Pro, the iQOO 13 comes out ahead in antutu and pixel density, while the X Fold 3 Pro wins on screen size and water resistance. Overall, the iQOO 13 scores 75.3 and the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.

Satın alma tavsiyesi

Hangisini almalısın?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (75.3 vs 73.1). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the iQOO 13 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are antutu, pixel density, weight, among others.

Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are screen size, water resistance, wireless charging.

Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Vivo - iQOO 13 neden kazanır

  • AnTuTu — 36.23% more. 2820000 vs 2070000.
  • Pixel density — 26.87% more. 510 ppi vs 402 ppi.
  • Weight — 23.00 g less. 213 vs 236.
  • Refresh rate — 20.00% more. 144 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Wired charging — 20.00% more. 120 W vs 100 W.
  • Battery capacity — 7.89% more. 6150 mAh vs 5700 mAh.

Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro neden kazanır

  • Screen size — 17.74% more. 8.03 " vs 6.82 ".
  • Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP69).
  • Wireless charging: 50 W vs 0 W.
Tüm veriler

Spec karşılaştırması

Design

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Weight213 glead236 g
Thickness8.13 mmlead11.2 mm
Water resistanceIP69IPX8lead
Form factorbarfoldable_booklead

Display

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Screen size6.82 "8.03 "lead
Pixel density510 ppilead402 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hzlead120 Hz
Peak brightness4500 nits4500 nits

Performance

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage512 GB512 GB
AnTuTu2820000lead2070000
CPU total clock22.6 GHzlead21.4 GHz

Cameras

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera32 MP32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Battery capacity6150 mAhlead5700 mAh
Wired charging120 Wlead100 W
Wireless charging0 W50 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates4 years4 years
Okuyucu soruları

Sık sorulanlar

Which has better battery, iQOO 13 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

iQOO 13 has 7.9% more battery — 6150 mAh vs 5700 mAh.

Which is lighter, iQOO 13 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

iQOO 13 is 23g lighter — 213g vs 236g.

Is iQOO 13 waterproof?+

iQOO 13 has an IP69 rating.

Does X Fold 3 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X Fold 3 Pro supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, iQOO 13 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Derine in

Spec bazlı detaylar

Üreticiye göre

Aynı markalardan dahası

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.