Between the Maya X and X2V2 Mini, the Maya X comes out ahead in max dpi and battery, while the X2V2 Mini wins on several specs. Overall, the Maya X scores 89.1 and the X2V2 Mini scores 86.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (89.1 vs 86.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Maya X if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are max dpi, battery, weight.
The X2V2 Mini similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable polling rate, wireless, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Lamzu - Maya X wins
- ▲Max DPI — 15.38% more. 30000 vs 26000.
- ▲Battery — 14.29% more. 80 h vs 70 h.
- ▲Weight — 5.00 g less. 47 vs 52.
Why Pulsar - X2V2 Mini wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 30000lead | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 750lead | 650 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 47 glead | 52 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 80 hlead | 70 h |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.