Between the Triflex HX2 and Pure One Station 5, the Triflex HX2 comes out ahead in several specs, while the Pure One Station 5 wins on dustbin and suction (aw). Overall, the Triflex HX2 scores 71.9 and the Pure One Station 5 scores 79.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Pure One Station 5 edges ahead on the Mars Score (71.9 vs 79.1), but the 7.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
The Triflex HX2 doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the Pure One Station 5 if you care most about dustbin and suction (aw). Its strongest claims are dustbin, suction (aw), battery, among others.
Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Pure One Station 5 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Miele - Triflex HX2 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Tineco - Pure One Station 5 wins
- ▲Dustbin — 20.00% more. 0.6 L vs 0.5 L.
- ▲Suction (AW) — 16.67% more. 210 vs 180.
- ▲Battery — 16.67% more. 70 min vs 60 min.
- ▲Weight — 1.05 kg less. 2.85 vs 3.9.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Miele - Triflex HX2 | Tineco - Pure One Station 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 180 | 210lead |
| Dustbin | 0.5 L | 0.6 Llead |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Miele - Triflex HX2 | Tineco - Pure One Station 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.9 kg | 2.85 kglead |
| Battery | 60 min | 70 minlead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.