Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro vs Vivo - X200 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Phone (3a) ProNOTHINGRENDER
Probe A
Nothing
Phone (3a) Pro
63.8/ 100C
Performance55· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200 Pro
74.0/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Phone (3a) Pro and X200 Pro, the Phone (3a) Pro comes out ahead in front camera and weight, while the X200 Pro wins on antutu and wired charging. Overall, the Phone (3a) Pro scores 63.8 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The X200 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 10.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the Phone (3a) Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are front camera, weight.

Pick the X200 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are antutu, wired charging, ram, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the X200 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro wins

  • Front camera — 56.25% more. 50 MP vs 32 MP.
  • Weight — 12.00 g less. 211 vs 223.

Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins

  • AnTuTu — 222.35% more. 2740000 vs 850000.
  • Wired charging — 80.00% more. 90 W vs 50 W.
  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • Battery capacity — 20.00% more. 6000 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
  • Pixel density — 16.80% more. 452 ppi vs 387 ppi.
  • Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP64).
  • Promised OS updates: 4 (vs 3).
  • Screen size — 0.15% more. 6.78 " vs 6.77 ".
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecNothing - Phone (3a) ProVivo - X200 Pro
Weight211 glead223 g
Thickness8.4 mmlead8.5 mm
Water resistanceIP64IP69lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecNothing - Phone (3a) ProVivo - X200 Pro
Screen size6.77 "6.78 "lead
Pixel density387 ppi452 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3000 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecNothing - Phone (3a) ProVivo - X200 Pro
RAM12 GB16 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu8500002740000lead
CPU total clock11.0 GHz23.2 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecNothing - Phone (3a) ProVivo - X200 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera50 MPlead32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecNothing - Phone (3a) ProVivo - X200 Pro
Battery capacity5000 mAh6000 mAhlead
Wired charging50 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecNothing - Phone (3a) ProVivo - X200 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecNothing - Phone (3a) ProVivo - X200 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates3 years4 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Phone (3a) Pro or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has 20.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Which is lighter, Phone (3a) Pro or X200 Pro?+

Phone (3a) Pro is 12g lighter — 211g vs 223g.

Is Phone (3a) Pro waterproof?+

Phone (3a) Pro has an IP64 rating.

Does X200 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Phone (3a) Pro or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Phone (3a) Pro or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.