Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra vs Vivo - X200

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Poco F7 UltraXIAOMIRENDER
Probe A
Xiaomi
Poco F7 Ultra
70.4/ 100B
Performance75· 25%
Battery66· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200VIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200
71.7/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Poco F7 Ultra and X200, the Poco F7 Ultra comes out ahead in wireless charging and wired charging, while the X200 wins on weight and battery capacity. Overall, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 70.4 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 71.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Poco F7 Ultra if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are wireless charging, wired charging, antutu.

Pick the X200 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are weight, battery capacity, pixel density.

Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, screen size, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra wins

  • Wireless charging — 66.67% more. 50 W vs 30 W.
  • Wired charging — 33.33% more. 120 W vs 90 W.
  • AnTuTu — 0.76% more. 2640000 vs 2620000.

Why Vivo - X200 wins

  • Weight — 10.00 g less. 202 vs 212.
  • Battery capacity — 9.43% more. 5800 mAh vs 5300 mAh.
  • Pixel density — 3.14% more. 460 ppi vs 446 ppi.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200
Weight212 g202 glead
Thickness8.4 mm8.0 mmlead
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200
Screen size6.67 "6.67 "
Pixel density446 ppi460 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3200 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
AnTuTu2640000lead2620000
CPU total clock22.8 GHzlead22.4 GHz

Cameras

SpecXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera32 MP32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200
Battery capacity5300 mAh5800 mAhlead
Wired charging120 Wlead90 W
Wireless charging50 Wlead30 W

Connectivity

SpecXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates4 years4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Poco F7 Ultra or X200?+

X200 has 9.4% more battery — 5300 mAh vs 5800 mAh.

Which is lighter, Poco F7 Ultra or X200?+

X200 is 10g lighter — 212g vs 202g.

Is Poco F7 Ultra waterproof?+

Poco F7 Ultra has an IP68 rating.

Does X200 support 5G?+

Yes, X200 supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, Poco F7 Ultra or X200?+

X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.