Between the ProArt PA32UCXR and ROG Swift PG34WCDM, the ProArt PA32UCXR comes out ahead in peak brightness and usb-c power delivery, while the ROG Swift PG34WCDM wins on refresh rate and response time (gtg). Overall, the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 and the ROG Swift PG34WCDM scores 75.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The ROG Swift PG34WCDM is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 9.7 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, usb-c power delivery.
Pick the ROG Swift PG34WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are refresh rate, response time (gtg), screen size, among others.
Both ship with comparable freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG34WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 23.08% more. 1600 nits vs 1300 nits.
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 6.67% more. 96 W vs 90 W.
Why ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 6.25% more. 34 " vs 32 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 " | 34 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4Klead | 1440p |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | truelead |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 240 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 5 ms | 0.03 mslead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1600 nitslead | 1300 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98 % | 99 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | truelead |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 3lead | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 96 Wlead | 90 W |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, ProArt PA32UCXR or ROG Swift PG34WCDM?+
ROG Swift PG34WCDM refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, ProArt PA32UCXR or ROG Swift PG34WCDM?+
ROG Swift PG34WCDM responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does ProArt PA32UCXR or ROG Swift PG34WCDM have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR, 90W on ROG Swift PG34WCDM.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.