Skip to content
vsMars
Spec drill · Response time (GtG)

Smart Monitor M8 (2024) vs UltraGear 32GS95UE-B

A side-by-side readout for response time (gtg).

Samsung · Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
4ms
LG · UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
0.03ms
▲ Lead
VerdictUltraGear 32GS95UE-B wins on response time (gtg).
Context

Understanding response time (gtg)

Response time (GtG) is a numeric spec measured in ms. On this metric, lower values are generally better — smaller, lighter, thinner, or less demanding usually translates to a more comfortable or more efficient product. When comparing two products, focus on the percentage gap rather than the raw delta: a 200-unit lead means something very different at the low end of the range than at the high end. Pay attention to the unit, too — manufacturers sometimes quote peak or burst figures that are not sustained in real-world use. Cross-check the published number against independent measurements where possible, especially for performance and battery claims. Finally, remember that a single spec rarely tells the whole story; the Mars Score weighs response time (gtg) together with the rest of the spec sheet so one outlier doesn't distort the verdict.

This matchupSmart Monitor M8 (2024)'s 4ms is roughly 13233% more than UltraGear 32GS95UE-B's 0.03ms (a 3.97ms gap). Lower is better here, so UltraGear 32GS95UE-B takes the lead in real use.

Drill more

Other specs on this comparison

See the full Monitörler category for all products ranked by Mars Score.