Acer - Predator X32 X3 vs Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Between the Predator X32 X3 and Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), the Predator X32 X3 comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery and g-sync, while the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins on screen size and panel type. Overall, the Predator X32 X3 scores 73.2 and the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) scores 89 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 15.8 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Predator X32 X3 if you care most about usb-c power delivery and g-sync. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, g-sync.
Pick the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are screen size, panel type.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), peak brightness, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Acer - Predator X32 X3 wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
Why Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins
- ▲Screen size — 53.13% more. 49 " vs 32 ".
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 " | 49 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | OLED | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 5Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 32:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | truelead |
Performance
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1000 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Predator X32 X3 or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, Predator X32 X3 or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does Predator X32 X3 or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on Predator X32 X3, 65W on Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC).
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.