Between the M4 Max (16-core) and Core i5-14600K, the M4 Max (16-core) comes out ahead in tdp and l3 cache, while the Core i5-14600K wins on boost clock. Overall, the M4 Max (16-core) scores 50.7 and the Core i5-14600K scores 52.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (50.7 vs 52.1). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the M4 Max (16-core) if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, l3 cache, cinebench r23 (multi).
Pick the Core i5-14600K if you care most about boost clock. Its strongest claims are boost clock.
Both ship with comparable cores, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Apple - M4 Max (16-core) wins
- ▲TDP — 80.00 W less. 45 vs 125.
- ▲L3 cache — 16.67% more. 28 MB vs 24 MB.
- ▲Cinebench R23 (multi) — 9.05% more. 26500 vs 24300.
Why Intel - Core i5-14600K wins
- ▲Boost clock — 17.78% more. 5.3 GHz vs 4.5 GHz.
Spec comparison
Cores
| Spec | Apple - M4 Max (16-core) | Intel - Core i5-14600K |
|---|---|---|
| Coresⓘ | 14 | 14 |
| Threadsⓘ | 14 | 20lead |
| Base clockⓘ | 0 GHz | 3.5 GHzlead |
| Boost clockⓘ | 4.5 GHz | 5.3 GHzlead |
| L3 cacheⓘ | 28 MBlead | 24 MB |
Platform
| Spec | Apple - M4 Max (16-core) | Intel - Core i5-14600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socketⓘ | Soldered | LGA1700 |
| TDPⓘ | 45 Wlead | 125 W |
| Integrated graphicsⓘ | true | true |
| DDR5ⓘ | true | true |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple - M4 Max (16-core) | Intel - Core i5-14600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cinebench R23 (multi)ⓘ | 26500lead | 24300 |
| Cinebench R23 (single)ⓘ | 2275lead | 2030 |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.