Skip to content
vsMars
Spec drill · Response time (GtG)

UltraSharp U3825QW vs MPG 321URX

A side-by-side readout for response time (gtg).

Dell · UltraSharp U3825QW
5ms
MSI · MPG 321URX
0.03ms
▲ Lead
VerdictMPG 321URX wins on response time (gtg).
Context

Understanding response time (gtg)

Response time (GtG) is a numeric spec measured in ms. On this metric, lower values are generally better — smaller, lighter, thinner, or less demanding usually translates to a more comfortable or more efficient product. When comparing two products, focus on the percentage gap rather than the raw delta: a 200-unit lead means something very different at the low end of the range than at the high end. Pay attention to the unit, too — manufacturers sometimes quote peak or burst figures that are not sustained in real-world use. Cross-check the published number against independent measurements where possible, especially for performance and battery claims. Finally, remember that a single spec rarely tells the whole story; the Mars Score weighs response time (gtg) together with the rest of the spec sheet so one outlier doesn't distort the verdict.

This matchupUltraSharp U3825QW's 5ms is roughly 16567% more than MPG 321URX's 0.03ms (a 4.97ms gap). Lower is better here, so MPG 321URX takes the lead in real use.

Drill more

Other specs on this comparison

See the full Monitore category for all products ranked by Mars Score.