Between the MAG 274URFDE and ProArt PA32UCXR, the MAG 274URFDE comes out ahead in response time (gtg) and refresh rate, while the ProArt PA32UCXR wins on peak brightness and screen size. Overall, the MAG 274URFDE scores 64.3 and the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (64.3 vs 65.4). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the MAG 274URFDE if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are response time (gtg), refresh rate, usb-c power delivery, among others.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, screen size, dci-p3 coverage.
Both ship with comparable freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why MSI - MAG 274URFDE wins
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 80.00% less. 1 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Refresh rate — 33.33% more. 160 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 2.08% more. 98 W vs 96 W.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Panel type: Rapid IPS (vs IPS).
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 166.67% more. 1600 nits vs 600 nits.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 3.16% more. 98 % vs 95 %.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | MSI - MAG 274URFDE | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 27 " | 32 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | Rapid IPSlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | MSI - MAG 274URFDE | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 160 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 1 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 600 nits | 1600 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 95 % | 98 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | MSI - MAG 274URFDE | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 3lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 98 Wlead | 96 W |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, MAG 274URFDE or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
MAG 274URFDE refreshes at 160Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, MAG 274URFDE or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
MAG 274URFDE responds in 1ms vs 5ms.
Does MAG 274URFDE or ProArt PA32UCXR have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 98W on MAG 274URFDE, 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.