Between the AT2020USB+ and NT1 5th Gen, the AT2020USB+ comes out ahead in max spl, while the NT1 5th Gen wins on connection. Overall, the AT2020USB+ scores 73.9 and the NT1 5th Gen scores 71.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (73.9 vs 71.1). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the AT2020USB+ if you care most about max spl. The biggest gaps in its favor are max spl.
Pick the NT1 5th Gen if you care most about connection. Its strongest claims are connection.
Both ship with comparable type, polar pattern, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Audio-Technica - AT2020USB+ wins
- ▲Max SPL — 1.41% more. 144 dB vs 142 dB.
Why Rode - NT1 5th Gen wins
- ▲Connection: XLR + USB (vs USB).
Spec comparison
Spec
| Spec | Audio-Technica - AT2020USB+ | Rode - NT1 5th Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Condenser | Condenser |
| Polar pattern | Cardioid | Cardioid |
| Frequency response | 20Hz–20kHz | 20Hz–20kHz |
| Max SPL | 144 dBlead | 142 dB |
Connectivity
| Spec | Audio-Technica - AT2020USB+ | Rode - NT1 5th Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Connection | USB | XLR + USBlead |
| Headphone out | true | true |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.