Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Beelink - EQ14 vs HP - Z2 Mini G1a

Last updated · How Mars Score works
EQ14BEELINKRENDER
Probe A
Beelink
EQ14
67.4/ 100C
Core46· 60%
Form & I/O95· 40%
Z2 Mini G1aHPRENDER
Probe B
HP
Z2 Mini G1a
60.1/ 100C
Core69· 60%
Form & I/O45· 40%
Quick verdict

Between the EQ14 and Z2 Mini G1a, the EQ14 comes out ahead in tdp and volume, while the Z2 Mini G1a wins on ram and storage. Overall, the EQ14 scores 67.4 and the Z2 Mini G1a scores 60.1 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The EQ14 edges ahead on the Mars Score (67.4 vs 60.1), but the 7.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the EQ14 if you care most about tdp and volume. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, volume.

Pick the Z2 Mini G1a if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are ram, storage, thunderbolt.

There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.

Bottom line: the EQ14 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Beelink - EQ14 wins

  • TDP — 105.00 W less. 15 vs 120.
  • Volume — 2.30 L less. 0.4 vs 2.7.

Why HP - Z2 Mini G1a wins

  • RAM — 300.00% more. 64 GB vs 16 GB.
  • Storage — 104.80% more. 1024 GB vs 500 GB.
  • Has Thunderbolt.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Core

SpecBeelink - EQ14HP - Z2 Mini G1a
CPUIntel N150AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
RAM16 GB64 GBlead
Storage500 GB1024 GBlead

Form & I/O

SpecBeelink - EQ14HP - Z2 Mini G1a
Volume0.4 Llead2.7 L
Weight0.45 kglead1.99 kg
TDP15 Wlead120 W
USB ports56lead
Thunderboltfalsetruelead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.