Between the SER9 HX 370 and Mac mini M2, the SER9 HX 370 comes out ahead in ram and storage, while the Mac mini M2 wins on tdp and thunderbolt. Overall, the SER9 HX 370 scores 70.4 and the Mac mini M2 scores 53.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The SER9 HX 370 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 16.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the SER9 HX 370 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are ram, storage, volume.
Pick the Mac mini M2 if you care most about tdp and thunderbolt. Its strongest claims are tdp, thunderbolt.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the SER9 HX 370 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Beelink - SER9 HX 370 wins
- ▲RAM — 300.00% more. 32 GB vs 8 GB.
- ▲Storage — 300.00% more. 1024 GB vs 256 GB.
- ▲Volume — 0.50 L less. 0.9 vs 1.4.
Why Apple - Mac mini M2 wins
- ▲TDP — 45.00 W less. 20 vs 65.
- ▲Has Thunderbolt.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - SER9 HX 370 | Apple - Mac mini M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.9 Llead | 1.4 L |
| Weight | 0.85 kglead | 1.18 kg |
| TDPⓘ | 65 W | 20 Wlead |
| USB ports | 6lead | 4 |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | truelead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.