Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW vs MSI - MPG 321URX

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraSharp U3825QWDELLRENDER
Probe A
Dell
UltraSharp U3825QW
71.2/ 100B
Performance70· 45%
Panel72· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
MPG 321URXMSIRENDER
Probe B
MSI
MPG 321URX
73.2/ 100B
Performance84· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraSharp U3825QW and MPG 321URX, the UltraSharp U3825QW comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery and screen size, while the MPG 321URX wins on peak brightness and refresh rate. Overall, the UltraSharp U3825QW scores 71.2 and the MPG 321URX scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (71.2 vs 73.2). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the UltraSharp U3825QW if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, screen size.

Pick the MPG 321URX if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.

Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW wins

  • USB-C Power Delivery — 42.86% more. 140 W vs 98 W.
  • Screen size — 17.19% more. 37.5 " vs 32 ".

Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins

  • Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
  • Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
  • Has G-Sync.
  • Has FreeSync.
  • Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecDell - UltraSharp U3825QWMSI - MPG 321URX
Screen size37.5 "lead32 "
Panel typeIPSQD-OLEDlead
Resolution4K4K
Aspect ratio21:916:9
Curvedtrueleadfalse

Performance

SpecDell - UltraSharp U3825QWMSI - MPG 321URX
Refresh rate120 Hz240 Hzlead
Response time (GtG)5 ms0.03 mslead
Peak brightness450 nits1000 nitslead
DCI-P3 coverage99 %99 %
HDRtruetrue
G-Syncfalsetruelead
FreeSyncfalsetruelead

Connectivity

SpecDell - UltraSharp U3825QWMSI - MPG 321URX
HDMI ports22
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery140 Wlead98 W
KVMtruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraSharp U3825QW or MPG 321URX?+

MPG 321URX refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraSharp U3825QW or MPG 321URX?+

MPG 321URX responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.

Does UltraSharp U3825QW or MPG 321URX have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 140W on UltraSharp U3825QW, 98W on MPG 321URX.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.