Between the Osmo Pocket 3 and RX0 II, the Osmo Pocket 3 comes out ahead in max 4k fps and horizon lock, while the RX0 II wins on waterproof depth. Overall, the Osmo Pocket 3 scores 95 and the RX0 II scores 35 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Osmo Pocket 3 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 60.0 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Osmo Pocket 3 if you care most about max 4k fps and horizon lock. The biggest gaps in its favor are max 4k fps, horizon lock, max video, among others.
Pick the RX0 II if you care most about waterproof depth. Its strongest claims are waterproof depth.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the Osmo Pocket 3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why DJI - Osmo Pocket 3 wins
- ▲Max 4K fps — 300.00% more. 120 vs 30.
- ▲Has Horizon lock.
- ▲Max video: 4K120 (vs 4K30).
- ▲Stabilization: gimbal-class (vs advanced).
Why Sony - RX0 II wins
- ▲Waterproof depth: 10 m vs 0 m.
Spec comparison
Video
| Spec | DJI - Osmo Pocket 3 | Sony - RX0 II |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 4K120lead | 4K30 |
| Max 4K fps | 120lead | 30 |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| Log profileⓘ | true | true |
Stabilization
| Spec | DJI - Osmo Pocket 3 | Sony - RX0 II |
|---|---|---|
| Horizon lock | truelead | false |
| Stabilization | gimbal-classlead | advanced |
Durability
| Spec | DJI - Osmo Pocket 3 | Sony - RX0 II |
|---|---|---|
| Waterproof depth | 0 m | 10 mlead |
| Weight | 179 g | 132 glead |
| Removable lens | false | false |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.