Between the XM2we and X2H Mini, the XM2we comes out ahead in battery, while the X2H Mini wins on polling rate and max dpi. Overall, the XM2we scores 69.6 and the X2H Mini scores 88.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X2H Mini is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 18.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the XM2we if you care most about battery. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery.
Pick the X2H Mini if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are polling rate, max dpi, weight.
Both ship with comparable wireless, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X2H Mini is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Endgame Gear - XM2we wins
- ▲Battery — 28.57% more. 90 h vs 70 h.
Why Pulsar - X2H Mini wins
- ▲Polling rate — 700.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 1000 Hz.
- ▲Max DPI — 23.08% more. 32000 vs 26000.
- ▲Weight — 10.00 g less. 53 vs 63.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 32000lead |
| Max IPS | 650 | 750lead |
| Polling rate | 1000 Hz | 8000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 63 g | 53 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 90 hlead | 70 h |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.