Between the GFX 100 II and X100VI, the GFX 100 II comes out ahead in megapixels and sensor size, while the X100VI wins on weight. Overall, the GFX 100 II scores 95 and the X100VI scores 57.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The GFX 100 II is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 37.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the GFX 100 II if you care most about megapixels and sensor size. The biggest gaps in its favor are megapixels, sensor size, max video.
Pick the X100VI if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight.
Both ship with comparable in-body stabilization, af points, log profile, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the GFX 100 II is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Fujifilm - GFX 100 II wins
- ▲Megapixels — 155.00% more. 102 MP vs 40 MP.
- ▲Sensor size: Medium Format (vs APS-C).
- ▲Max video: 8K (vs 6K).
Why Fujifilm - X100VI wins
- ▲Weight — 509.00 g less. 521 vs 1030.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Fujifilm - GFX 100 II | Fujifilm - X100VI |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor sizeⓘ | Medium Formatlead | APS-C |
| Megapixels | 102 MPlead | 40 MP |
| Max ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Video
| Spec | Fujifilm - GFX 100 II | Fujifilm - X100VI |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 8Klead | 6K |
| RAW video | truelead | false |
| Log profileⓘ | true | true |
Autofocus
| Spec | Fujifilm - GFX 100 II | Fujifilm - X100VI |
|---|---|---|
| AF pointsⓘ | 425 | 425 |
| Eye AFⓘ | true | true |
| In-body stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Body & Controls
| Spec | Fujifilm - GFX 100 II | Fujifilm - X100VI |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1030 g | 521 glead |
| Weather sealedⓘ | truelead | false |
| Dual card slotsⓘ | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.