Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P vs ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM
Between the AORUS FO32U2P and ROG Swift PG34WCDM, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in several specs, while the ROG Swift PG34WCDM wins on usb-c power delivery and peak brightness. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 and the ROG Swift PG34WCDM scores 75.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 75.1). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
The AORUS FO32U2P doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the ROG Swift PG34WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, peak brightness, screen size.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), dci-p3 coverage, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
- ▲Screen size — 6.25% more. 34 " vs 32 ".
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 " | 34 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLED | QD-OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4Klead | 1440p |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | truelead |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1300 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 90 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or ROG Swift PG34WCDM?+
ROG Swift PG34WCDM refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or ROG Swift PG34WCDM?+
ROG Swift PG34WCDM responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or ROG Swift PG34WCDM have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on AORUS FO32U2P, 90W on ROG Swift PG34WCDM.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.