G.Skill - Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-6400 32GB vs Kingston - FURY Renegade DDR5-8000 32GB
Between the Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-6400 32GB and FURY Renegade DDR5-8000 32GB, the Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-6400 32GB comes out ahead in cas latency, while the FURY Renegade DDR5-8000 32GB wins on speed. Overall, the Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-6400 32GB scores 70.5 and the FURY Renegade DDR5-8000 32GB scores 77.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The FURY Renegade DDR5-8000 32GB edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.5 vs 77.6), but the 7.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-6400 32GB if you care most about cas latency. The biggest gaps in its favor are cas latency.
Pick the FURY Renegade DDR5-8000 32GB if you care most about speed. Its strongest claims are speed.
Both ship with comparable capacity, generation, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the FURY Renegade DDR5-8000 32GB is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why G.Skill - Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-6400 32GB wins
- ▲CAS latency — 6.00 less. 32 vs 38.
Why Kingston - FURY Renegade DDR5-8000 32GB wins
- ▲Speed — 25.00% more. 8000 MT/s vs 6400 MT/s.
Spec comparison
Spec
| Spec | G.Skill - Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-6400 32GB | Kingston - FURY Renegade DDR5-8000 32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Speed | 6400 MT/s | 8000 MT/slead |
| CAS latency | 32lead | 38 |
Extras
| Spec | G.Skill - Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-6400 32GB | Kingston - FURY Renegade DDR5-8000 32GB |
|---|---|---|
| RGB | true | true |
| Heatspreader | true | true |
| ECC | false | false |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.