Between the PX3-Pro and UHZ65UST, the PX3-Pro comes out ahead in several specs, while the UHZ65UST wins on brightness. Overall, the PX3-Pro scores 80.1 and the UHZ65UST scores 87.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The UHZ65UST edges ahead on the Mars Score (80.1 vs 87.6), but the 7.5-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
The PX3-Pro doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the UHZ65UST if you care most about brightness. Its strongest claims are brightness.
Both ship with comparable resolution, light source, short-throw, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the UHZ65UST is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Hisense - PX3-Pro wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Optoma - UHZ65UST wins
- ▲Brightness — 16.67% more. 3500 lm vs 3000 lm.
Spec comparison
Image
| Spec | Hisense - PX3-Pro | Optoma - UHZ65UST |
|---|---|---|
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Brightness | 3000 lm | 3500 lmlead |
| Contrast | 3000:1 | 2500000:1 |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Short-throw | true | true |
Smart & Connectivity
| Spec | Hisense - PX3-Pro | Optoma - UHZ65UST |
|---|---|---|
| Smart OS | Google TV | None |
| HDMI inputs | 3 | 3 |
| Built-in speakers | true | true |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.