Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ40 vs Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo
Between the Instax SQUARE SQ40 and Instax Wide Evo, the Instax SQUARE SQ40 comes out ahead in film format, while the Instax Wide Evo wins on hybrid (digital + print) and double exposure. Overall, the Instax SQUARE SQ40 scores 73.1 and the Instax Wide Evo scores 69.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Instax SQUARE SQ40 edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.1 vs 69.4), but the 3.7-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Instax SQUARE SQ40 if you care most about film format. The biggest gaps in its favor are film format.
Pick the Instax Wide Evo if you care most about hybrid (digital + print) and double exposure. Its strongest claims are hybrid (digital + print), double exposure.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ40 wins
- ▲Film format: Instax square (vs Instax wide).
Why Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo wins
- ▲Has Hybrid (digital + print).
- ▲Has Double exposure.
Spec comparison
Film
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ40 | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | Instax squarelead | Instax wide |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | false | truelead |
Features
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ40 | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Selfie mirror | truelead | false |
| Double exposure | false | truelead |
| Lens count | 1 | 1 |
Design
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ40 | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 457 glead | 490 g |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.