Between the Thorn and X2H Mini, the Thorn comes out ahead in battery and weight, while the X2H Mini wins on polling rate and max dpi. Overall, the Thorn scores 79.9 and the X2H Mini scores 88.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X2H Mini is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Thorn if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery, weight.
Pick the X2H Mini if you care most about polling rate and max dpi. Its strongest claims are polling rate, max dpi.
Both ship with comparable wireless, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X2H Mini is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Lamzu - Thorn wins
- ▲Battery — 14.29% more. 80 h vs 70 h.
- ▲Weight — 1.00 g less. 52 vs 53.
Why Pulsar - X2H Mini wins
- ▲Polling rate — 100.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz.
- ▲Max DPI — 6.67% more. 32000 vs 30000.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 30000 | 32000lead |
| Max IPS | 750 | 750 |
| Polling rate | 4000 Hz | 8000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 52 glead | 53 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 80 hlead | 70 h |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.