Skip to content
vsMars
Spec drill · Weight

NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S vs 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

A side-by-side readout for weight.

Nikon · NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
1440g
▲ Lead
Tamron · 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
1725g
VerdictNIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S wins on weight.
Context

Understanding weight

Weight is a numeric spec measured in g. On this metric, lower values are generally better — smaller, lighter, thinner, or less demanding usually translates to a more comfortable or more efficient product. When comparing two products, focus on the percentage gap rather than the raw delta: a 200-unit lead means something very different at the low end of the range than at the high end. Pay attention to the unit, too — manufacturers sometimes quote peak or burst figures that are not sustained in real-world use. Cross-check the published number against independent measurements where possible, especially for performance and battery claims. Finally, remember that a single spec rarely tells the whole story; the Mars Score weighs weight together with the rest of the spec sheet so one outlier doesn't distort the verdict.

This matchup150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD's 1725g is roughly 20% more than NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S's 1440g (a 285g gap). Lower is better here, so NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S takes the lead in real use.

Drill more

Other specs on this comparison

See the full Camera Lenses category for all products ranked by Mars Score.