Roborock - H7 Cordless vs Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511
Between the H7 Cordless and Detect Pro Cordless IW1511, the H7 Cordless comes out ahead in battery and weight, while the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 wins on dustbin and suction (aw). Overall, the H7 Cordless scores 67 and the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 scores 69.5 on our Mars Score.
¿Cuál deberías comprar?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (67 vs 69.5). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the H7 Cordless if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery, weight.
Pick the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if you care most about dustbin and suction (aw). Its strongest claims are dustbin, suction (aw).
Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Por qué gana Roborock - H7 Cordless
- ▲Battery — 50.00% more. 90 min vs 60 min.
- ▲Weight — 2.30 kg less. 1.4 vs 3.7.
Por qué gana Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511
- ▲Dustbin — 40.00% more. 0.7 L vs 0.5 L.
- ▲Suction (AW) — 6.25% more. 170 vs 160.
Comparación de specs
Performance
| Spec | Roborock - H7 Cordless | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 160 | 170lead |
| Dustbin | 0.5 L | 0.7 Llead |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Roborock - H7 Cordless | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 1.4 kglead | 3.7 kg |
| Battery | 90 minlead | 60 min |
Análisis por spec
Más de las mismas marcas
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.