Between the AT2020USB+ and Wireless PRO, the AT2020USB+ comes out ahead in max spl, while the Wireless PRO wins on connection. Overall, the AT2020USB+ scores 73.9 and the Wireless PRO scores 41.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The AT2020USB+ is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 32.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the AT2020USB+ if you care most about max spl. The biggest gaps in its favor are max spl.
Pick the Wireless PRO if you care most about connection. Its strongest claims are connection.
Both ship with comparable type, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the AT2020USB+ is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Audio-Technica - AT2020USB+ wins
- ▲Max SPL — 17.07% more. 144 dB vs 123 dB.
Why Rode - Wireless PRO wins
- ▲Connection: Wireless (vs USB).
Spec comparison
Spec
| Spec | Audio-Technica - AT2020USB+ | Rode - Wireless PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Condenser | Condenser |
| Polar pattern | Cardioid | Omnidirectional |
| Frequency response | 20Hz–20kHz | 50Hz–20kHz |
| Max SPL | 144 dBlead | 123 dB |
Connectivity
| Spec | Audio-Technica - AT2020USB+ | Rode - Wireless PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Connection | USB | Wirelesslead |
| Headphone out | truelead | false |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.