Between the SER9 HX 370 and NucBox K11, the SER9 HX 370 comes out ahead in tdp and volume, while the NucBox K11 wins on several specs. Overall, the SER9 HX 370 scores 70.4 and the NucBox K11 scores 68.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 68.6). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the SER9 HX 370 if you care most about tdp and volume. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, volume.
The NucBox K11 similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable ram, storage, thunderbolt, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Beelink - SER9 HX 370 wins
- ▲TDP — 5.00 W less. 65 vs 70.
- ▲Volume — 0.20 L less. 0.9 vs 1.1.
Why GMKtec - NucBox K11 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - SER9 HX 370 | GMKtec - NucBox K11 |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.9 Llead | 1.1 L |
| Weight | 0.85 kglead | 0.95 kg |
| TDPⓘ | 65 Wlead | 70 W |
| USB ports | 6lead | 5 |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | false |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.