Between the SER9 HX 370 and NucBox M6, the SER9 HX 370 comes out ahead in ram and storage, while the NucBox M6 wins on tdp and volume. Overall, the SER9 HX 370 scores 70.4 and the NucBox M6 scores 67.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The SER9 HX 370 edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 67.1), but the 3.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the SER9 HX 370 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are ram, storage.
Pick the NucBox M6 if you care most about tdp and volume. Its strongest claims are tdp, volume.
Both ship with comparable thunderbolt, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Beelink - SER9 HX 370 wins
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 32 GB vs 16 GB.
- ▲Storage — 100.00% more. 1024 GB vs 512 GB.
Why GMKtec - NucBox M6 wins
- ▲TDP — 20.00 W less. 45 vs 65.
- ▲Volume — 0.35 L less. 0.55 vs 0.9.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - SER9 HX 370 | GMKtec - NucBox M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.9 L | 0.55 Llead |
| Weight | 0.85 kg | 0.55 kglead |
| TDPⓘ | 65 W | 45 Wlead |
| USB ports | 6lead | 4 |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | false |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.