Skip to content
vsMars
Face à face

Samsung - Galaxy A36 vs Vivo - X200

Dernière mise à jour · Comment fonctionne le Mars Score
Galaxy A36SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy A36
61.5/ 100C
Performance47· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200VIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200
71.7/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Verdict rapide

Between the Galaxy A36 and X200, the Galaxy A36 comes out ahead in weight and promised os updates, while the X200 wins on antutu and front camera. Overall, the Galaxy A36 scores 61.5 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.

Conseil d’achat

Lequel choisir ?

The X200 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 10.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the Galaxy A36 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, promised os updates, screen size.

Pick the X200 if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are antutu, front camera, wired charging, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the X200 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Pourquoi Samsung - Galaxy A36 gagne

  • Weight — 7.00 g less. 195 vs 202.
  • Promised OS updates: 6 (vs 4).
  • Screen size — 0.45% more. 6.7 " vs 6.67 ".

Pourquoi Vivo - X200 gagne

  • AnTuTu — 309.38% more. 2620000 vs 640000.
  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Wired charging — 100.00% more. 90 W vs 45 W.
  • RAM — 50.00% more. 12 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Pixel density — 19.48% more. 460 ppi vs 385 ppi.
  • Battery capacity — 16.00% more. 5800 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
  • Water resistance: IP68 (vs IP67).
  • Wireless charging: 30 W vs 0 W.
Fiche complète

Comparaison des specs

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X200
Weight195 glead202 g
Thickness7.4 mmlead8.0 mm
Water resistanceIP67IP68lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X200
Screen size6.7 "lead6.67 "
Pixel density385 ppi460 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1900 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X200
RAM8 GB12 GBlead
Storage128 GB256 GBlead
AnTuTu6400002620000lead
CPU total clock8.4 GHz22.4 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X200
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X200
Battery capacity5000 mAh5800 mAhlead
Wired charging45 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X200
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X200
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates6 yearslead4 years
Questions des lecteurs

Questions fréquentes

Which has better battery, Galaxy A36 or X200?+

X200 has 16.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5800 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy A36 or X200?+

Galaxy A36 is 7g lighter — 195g vs 202g.

Is Galaxy A36 waterproof?+

Galaxy A36 has an IP67 rating.

Does X200 support 5G?+

Yes, X200 supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Galaxy A36 or X200?+

X200 offers 12GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy A36 or X200?+

X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

En détail

Analyses spec par spec

Par fabricant

Plus des mêmes marques

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.