Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy S26+ vs Vivo - X200 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy S26+SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy S26+
68.5/ 100B
Performance72· 25%
Battery61· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200 Pro
74.0/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy S26+ and X200 Pro, the Galaxy S26+ comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the X200 Pro wins on front camera and wired charging. Overall, the Galaxy S26+ scores 68.5 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The X200 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (68.5 vs 74), but the 5.5-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Galaxy S26+ if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density, promised os updates.

Pick the X200 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, wired charging, wireless charging, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the X200 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Samsung - Galaxy S26+ wins

  • Weight — 27.00 g less. 196 vs 223.
  • Pixel density — 13.50% more. 513 ppi vs 452 ppi.
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 4).

Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins

  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Wired charging — 100.00% more. 90 W vs 45 W.
  • Wireless charging — 100.00% more. 30 W vs 15 W.
  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • AnTuTu — 24.55% more. 2740000 vs 2200000.
  • Battery capacity — 22.45% more. 6000 mAh vs 4900 mAh.
  • Screen size — 1.19% more. 6.78 " vs 6.7 ".
  • Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP68).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26+Vivo - X200 Pro
Weight196 glead223 g
Thickness7.6 mmlead8.5 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP69lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26+Vivo - X200 Pro
Screen size6.7 "6.78 "lead
Pixel density513 ppilead452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2600 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26+Vivo - X200 Pro
RAM12 GB16 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu22000002740000lead
CPU total clock22.4 GHz23.2 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26+Vivo - X200 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26+Vivo - X200 Pro
Battery capacity4900 mAh6000 mAhlead
Wired charging45 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging15 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26+Vivo - X200 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26+Vivo - X200 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates7 yearslead4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy S26+ or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has 22.4% more battery — 4900 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy S26+ or X200 Pro?+

Galaxy S26+ is 27g lighter — 196g vs 223g.

Is Galaxy S26+ waterproof?+

Galaxy S26+ has an IP68 rating.

Does X200 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Galaxy S26+ or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy S26+ or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.