Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Honor - Magic7 Lite vs Vivo - X200 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Magic7 LiteHONORRENDER
Probe A
Honor
Magic7 Lite
69.2/ 100B
Performance48· 25%
Battery80· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras82· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200 Pro
74.0/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Magic7 Lite and X200 Pro, the Magic7 Lite comes out ahead in main camera and weight, while the X200 Pro wins on antutu and ram. Overall, the Magic7 Lite scores 69.2 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The X200 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (69.2 vs 74), but the 4.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Magic7 Lite if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are main camera, weight, battery capacity.

Pick the X200 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are antutu, ram, front camera, among others.

Both ship with comparable screen size, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Honor - Magic7 Lite wins

  • Main camera — 116.00% more. 108 MP vs 50 MP.
  • Weight — 34.00 g less. 189 vs 223.
  • Battery capacity — 10.00% more. 6600 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins

  • AnTuTu — 321.54% more. 2740000 vs 650000.
  • RAM — 100.00% more. 16 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Front camera — 100.00% more. 32 MP vs 16 MP.
  • Wired charging — 36.36% more. 90 W vs 66 W.
  • Pixel density — 14.43% more. 452 ppi vs 395 ppi.
  • Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP68).
  • Promised OS updates: 4 (vs 3).
  • Wireless charging: 30 W vs 0 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200 Pro
Weight189 glead223 g
Thickness7.98 mmlead8.5 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP69lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200 Pro
Screen size6.78 "6.78 "
Pixel density395 ppi452 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3500 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200 Pro
RAM8 GB16 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu6500002740000lead
CPU total clock9.0 GHz23.2 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200 Pro
Main camera108 MPlead50 MP
Front camera16 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200 Pro
Battery capacity6600 mAhlead6000 mAh
Wired charging66 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates3 years4 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Magic7 Lite or X200 Pro?+

Magic7 Lite has 10.0% more battery — 6600 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Which is lighter, Magic7 Lite or X200 Pro?+

Magic7 Lite is 34g lighter — 189g vs 223g.

Is Magic7 Lite waterproof?+

Magic7 Lite has an IP68 rating.

Does X200 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Magic7 Lite or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Magic7 Lite or X200 Pro?+

Magic7 Lite has a 108 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.