Between the Pulsefire Haste 2 and X2H Mini, the Pulsefire Haste 2 comes out ahead in several specs, while the X2H Mini wins on max dpi and weight. Overall, the Pulsefire Haste 2 scores 84.6 and the X2H Mini scores 88.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X2H Mini edges ahead on the Mars Score (84.6 vs 88.2), but the 3.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
The Pulsefire Haste 2 doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the X2H Mini if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are max dpi, weight, wireless, among others.
Both ship with comparable polling rate, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Pulsar - X2H Mini wins
- ▲Max DPI — 23.08% more. 32000 vs 26000.
- ▲Weight — 8.00 g less. 53 vs 61.
- ▲Wireless: true (vs false).
- ▲Battery: 70 h vs 0 h.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 32000lead |
| Max IPS | 650 | 750lead |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 61 g | 53 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | false | truelead |
| Battery | 0 h | 70 hlead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.