OM System - OM-1 Mark II vs Sony - ZV-E10 II

The ZV-E10 II edges ahead on the Mars Score (42.8 vs 47.6), but the 4.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the OM-1 Mark II if you care most about af points and in-body stabilization. The biggest gaps in its favor are af points, in-body stabilization.

Pick the ZV-E10 II if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, megapixels, sensor size.

Both ship with comparable max video, log profile, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.